Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18781 - 18790 of 30165 for de.
Search results 18781 - 18790 of 30165 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Virtis A.
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6666 - 2017-09-20
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6666 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Harry Montey
are questions of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13694 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13694 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to our de novo review. See State v. Cockrell, 2007 WI App 217, ¶14, 306 Wis. 2d 52, 741 N.W.2d 267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514533 - 2022-04-26
to our de novo review. See State v. Cockrell, 2007 WI App 217, ¶14, 306 Wis. 2d 52, 741 N.W.2d 267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514533 - 2022-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo. See State v. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d 544, 546-47, 335 N.W.2d 399 (1983); Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155860 - 2017-09-21
de novo. See State v. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d 544, 546-47, 335 N.W.2d 399 (1983); Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155860 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the complaint against him. We conclude that he could not do so. An appellate court reviews de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246769 - 2019-09-12
the complaint against him. We conclude that he could not do so. An appellate court reviews de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246769 - 2019-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Lindholm
that the defendant has committed a felony is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15938 - 2017-09-21
that the defendant has committed a felony is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15938 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶39. “[A] finding of fact is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039997 - 2025-11-18
requirements is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶39. “[A] finding of fact is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039997 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion, should be subject to de novo review.” Citing State v. Johnson, 177 Wis. 2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
conclusion, should be subject to de novo review.” Citing State v. Johnson, 177 Wis. 2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
The complaint[2] alleged that Wyand-Williams was a student at St. Norbert College in De Pere, Wisconsin. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92234 - 2013-01-28
The complaint[2] alleged that Wyand-Williams was a student at St. Norbert College in De Pere, Wisconsin. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92234 - 2013-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78627 - 2012-02-29
review de novo whether a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78627 - 2012-02-29