Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18791 - 18800 of 30164 for de.
Search results 18791 - 18800 of 30164 for de.
Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 56
. “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” State ex rel. West v. Bartow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143699 - 2017-09-21
. “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” State ex rel. West v. Bartow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143699 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60761 - 2014-09-15
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60761 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a statute de novo. State v. Wood, 2010 WI 17, ¶15, 323 Wis. 2d 321, 780 N.W.2d 63. The party bringing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155567 - 2017-09-21
to a statute de novo. State v. Wood, 2010 WI 17, ¶15, 323 Wis. 2d 321, 780 N.W.2d 63. The party bringing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frank P. Howard
case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schulz v. Ystad, 155 Wis.2d 574, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8790 - 2017-09-19
case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schulz v. Ystad, 155 Wis.2d 574, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8790 - 2017-09-19
Alan Derzon v. Appleton Papers, Inc.
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2769 - 2005-03-31
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2769 - 2005-03-31
2011 WI APP 12
or discretionary is a matter of statutory construction,” which presents a question of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57319 - 2011-01-30
or discretionary is a matter of statutory construction,” which presents a question of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57319 - 2011-01-30
Green Valley Disposal Co., Inc. v. Soils and Engineering Services, Inc.
is unconscionable is a question of law, which we review de novo. Leasefirst v. Hartford Rexall Drugs, Inc., 168 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14469 - 2005-03-31
is unconscionable is a question of law, which we review de novo. Leasefirst v. Hartford Rexall Drugs, Inc., 168 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14469 - 2005-03-31
State v. Philip J. Foster
materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric Garcia
. Whether a search is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7313 - 2014-03-24
. Whether a search is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7313 - 2014-03-24