Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18791 - 18800 of 29712 for des.

[PDF] WI 25
that this court reviews de novo.'" Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2009 WI 70, ¶7, 318 Wis. 2d 681, 768 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48698 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Westby-Coon Valley State Bank v. Hiram Lund
the trial court, and we review its decision de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12271 - 2014-09-15

State v. Corey J.G.
review such questions de novo. See First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17177 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James M. Kernz v. J. L. French Corporation
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Windom, 169 Wis. 2d 341, 349, 485 N.W.2d 832 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5256 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James M. Gallagher v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative
’ consent. The Gallaghers argue that we should review this ruling de novo, and conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3541 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo; whether to apply the doctrine if the elements are met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55042 - 2014-09-15

Merlin Weber v. Town of Saukville
as controlling or persuasive and that we should interpret the term [in question] de novo. Marris v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16943 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 48
, the interpretation of a written contract raises a question of law that we review de novo. Id. II. WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697514 - 2023-10-11

[PDF] Kelly Gilmore and * v. Laurice Westerman
. The interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law, which we review de novo. Katze v. Randolph
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8969 - 2017-09-19

State v. Edward F. Topping
to the undisputed facts of this case presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Koeppen I, 195 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3633 - 2005-03-31