Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18791 - 18800 of 41702 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 18791 - 18800 of 41702 for jury duty/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
believed that the jury would wonder why the sister did not testify and if the jury was perplexed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137275 - 2015-03-17
believed that the jury would wonder why the sister did not testify and if the jury was perplexed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137275 - 2015-03-17
State v. Jermaine M. Webb
), raising four potential issues: (1) sufficiency of the evidence; (2) adequacy of the jury instructions; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10405 - 2005-03-31
), raising four potential issues: (1) sufficiency of the evidence; (2) adequacy of the jury instructions; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10405 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by the jury. State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493, 506-07, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). It is the function
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50330 - 2010-05-25
by the jury. State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493, 506-07, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). It is the function
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50330 - 2010-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
him after a jury trial of one count of unlawfully possessing a firearm after being convicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602633 - 2022-12-20
him after a jury trial of one count of unlawfully possessing a firearm after being convicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602633 - 2022-12-20
State v. Casey M. Fisher
CURIAM. Casey M. Fisher, pro se, appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury convicted him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10683 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Casey M. Fisher, pro se, appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury convicted him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10683 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the interest of justice. We reject these arguments and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2008, a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165686 - 2017-09-21
in the interest of justice. We reject these arguments and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2008, a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165686 - 2017-09-21
State v. Larry D. Hicks
appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of disorderly conduct, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06
appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of disorderly conduct, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06
State v. David J. Balliette
. ¶2 Balliette was convicted after a jury trial of homicide by the intoxicated use of a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4395 - 2005-03-31
. ¶2 Balliette was convicted after a jury trial of homicide by the intoxicated use of a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4395 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. La Rance Thacker
a fair trial because it made allegedly prejudicial remarks in the presence of the jury; and (3) erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7901 - 2017-09-19
a fair trial because it made allegedly prejudicial remarks in the presence of the jury; and (3) erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7901 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
proceedings, we affirm the order. Background ¶2 In 2007, a jury convicted Maus of two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
proceedings, we affirm the order. Background ¶2 In 2007, a jury convicted Maus of two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12