Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18791 - 18800 of 64078 for records/1000.
Search results 18791 - 18800 of 64078 for records/1000.
Randy D. Purifoy v. Bill Puckett
no indication in the record that the PRC actually made such a decision. Its written decision does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12872 - 2005-03-31
no indication in the record that the PRC actually made such a decision. Its written decision does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12872 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After an independent review of the record, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244068 - 2019-07-18
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After an independent review of the record, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244068 - 2019-07-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the Record, we have identified an issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105615 - 2017-09-21
and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the Record, we have identified an issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105615 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP286-CRNM 2 merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453177 - 2021-11-17
. No. 2021AP286-CRNM 2 merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453177 - 2021-11-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the records, the court concludes that the records do not show arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710053 - 2023-10-03
of the records, the court concludes that the records do not show arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710053 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Edward L. Carter
at more than $2500 as a habitual offender. He contends that no factual basis exists in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9244 - 2017-09-19
at more than $2500 as a habitual offender. He contends that no factual basis exists in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9244 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983984 - 2025-07-17
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983984 - 2025-07-17
CA Blank Order
of the brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131345 - 2014-12-08
of the brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131345 - 2014-12-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645284 - 2023-04-28
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645284 - 2023-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. There we said that “when evidence in the record consists of disputed testimony and a video recording, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132228 - 2014-12-29
. There we said that “when evidence in the record consists of disputed testimony and a video recording, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132228 - 2014-12-29