Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1881 - 1890 of 82884 for case search.
Search results 1881 - 1890 of 82884 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
There are multiple searches and seizures that occurred in this case implicating the Fourth Amendment. At least two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285761 - 2020-09-09
There are multiple searches and seizures that occurred in this case implicating the Fourth Amendment. At least two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285761 - 2020-09-09
State v. Anthony Harris
was a passenger because they believed that a robbery suspect for whom they were searching, John D. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31
was a passenger because they believed that a robbery suspect for whom they were searching, John D. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Harris
was a passenger because they believed that a robbery suspect for whom they were searching, John D. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9176 - 2005-03-31
was a passenger because they believed that a robbery suspect for whom they were searching, John D. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9176 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. In other cases, however, “the offense of arrest will supply a basis for searching the passenger compartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133337 - 2015-01-21
. In other cases, however, “the offense of arrest will supply a basis for searching the passenger compartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133337 - 2015-01-21
State v. William R. Junnor
the standard of review applicable in suppression cases: The constitutional validity of a search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19039 - 2005-07-18
the standard of review applicable in suppression cases: The constitutional validity of a search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19039 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
State v. William R. Junnor
“no.” Washington then asked Junnor if he could check (by conducting a pat-down search). Junnor responded “go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
“no.” Washington then asked Junnor if he could check (by conducting a pat-down search). Junnor responded “go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Travis J. Smith
to suppress evidence that was discovered during an allegedly illegal search; and (2) denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
to suppress evidence that was discovered during an allegedly illegal search; and (2) denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
State v. Travis J. Smith
an allegedly illegal search; and (2) denied his motion for a new trial without holding an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6189 - 2005-03-31
an allegedly illegal search; and (2) denied his motion for a new trial without holding an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal treat this case as a stop-and-frisk case, and therefore, subject to the limitations to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185479 - 2017-09-21
on appeal treat this case as a stop-and-frisk case, and therefore, subject to the limitations to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185479 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Weber II
statements he made during booking after his arrest and any physical evidence seized as a result of a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5040 - 2017-09-19
statements he made during booking after his arrest and any physical evidence seized as a result of a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5040 - 2017-09-19

