Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1881 - 1890 of 63511 for records.

Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm the judgment. . Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2006-08-07

State v. Victor Groner
discovered evidence. That evidence consisted of information that: (1) a police record concerning Julie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5684 - 2005-03-31

Daniel Sagert v. Waukesha County Treasurer
as the ownership … appears of record in the office of the register of deeds of the county in which the parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25151 - 2006-05-16

[PDF] State v. Jesus Barbary
counsel at the county’s expense. Based on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11590 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
error, and the circuit court failed to properly exercise its discretion on the record regarding its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193784 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jesus Barbary
. Based on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Daniel Sagert v. Waukesha County Treasurer
as the ownership … appears of record in the office of the register of deeds of the county in which the parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25151 - 2017-09-21

State v. William H. Roberts
was intoxicated. Looking at Roberts’ driving record, the deputy saw that Roberts had been convicted of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
record citations as required by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d)-(e) (2015-16). Kristin’s brief also lacks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216169 - 2018-07-31

[PDF] Steven H. Hoyme v. Janice S. Brakken
. STAT. § 814.025. Because the record supports the trial court’s decision, we affirm the order. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19