Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1881 - 1890 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 1881 - 1890 of 58483 for speedy trial.
State v. Otis G. Mattox
grounds. Mattox submits that the trial court’s reasons for declaring a mistrial over his and the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25143 - 2006-06-27
grounds. Mattox submits that the trial court’s reasons for declaring a mistrial over his and the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25143 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Otis G. Mattox
)(a) and 939.63(1)(2) (2003-04), 2 on double jeopardy grounds. Mattox submits that the trial court’s reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25143 - 2017-09-21
)(a) and 939.63(1)(2) (2003-04), 2 on double jeopardy grounds. Mattox submits that the trial court’s reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25143 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
pleas were constitutionally defective, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32438 - 2014-09-15
pleas were constitutionally defective, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32438 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31786 - 2008-02-11
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31786 - 2008-02-11
State v. Sean Fitzgerald Rowell
Rowell, II, appeals the judgment, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14006 - 2005-03-31
Rowell, II, appeals the judgment, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14006 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sean Fitzgerald Rowell
Fitzgerald Rowell, II, appeals the judgment, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14006 - 2014-09-15
Fitzgerald Rowell, II, appeals the judgment, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14006 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty pleas were constitutionally defective, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32438 - 2008-04-14
guilty pleas were constitutionally defective, and whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32438 - 2008-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
-02).[1] Matthews argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101254 - 2013-08-26
-02).[1] Matthews argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101254 - 2013-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 948.02(2) (2001-02). 1 Matthews argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101254 - 2017-09-21
WIS. STAT. § 948.02(2) (2001-02). 1 Matthews argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101254 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Patterson seeks resentencing on grounds that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63727 - 2011-05-09
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Patterson seeks resentencing on grounds that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63727 - 2011-05-09