Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18801 - 18810 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 18801 - 18810 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Michael Martin Burds v. Kathy Ann Walsh-Burds
the property division. She No. 96-1546 2 claims that the trial court erred by not excluding from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10892 - 2017-09-20
the property division. She No. 96-1546 2 claims that the trial court erred by not excluding from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10892 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granting summary judgment on SoftwareOne, Inc.’s (“SoftwareOne”) claims for civil theft, breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485788 - 2022-02-23
granting summary judgment on SoftwareOne, Inc.’s (“SoftwareOne”) claims for civil theft, breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485788 - 2022-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion.1 Breeden raises multiple claims of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel and one due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625488 - 2023-02-21
motion.1 Breeden raises multiple claims of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel and one due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625488 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
O’Brien, LLP (the Anderson law firm), insofar as those claims involve Pies’ work on Hiram and Floy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048362 - 2025-12-09
O’Brien, LLP (the Anderson law firm), insofar as those claims involve Pies’ work on Hiram and Floy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048362 - 2025-12-09
[PDF]
Jeffrey D. Knickmeier v. James E. Reinke
, the circuit court issued a second order. In that order, the court denied Knickmeier’s claim for attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26006 - 2017-09-21
, the circuit court issued a second order. In that order, the court denied Knickmeier’s claim for attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26006 - 2017-09-21
Miguel Gallego v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
affirm the dismissal of Gallego’s claim under Wis. Stat. § 100.18 because a more specific statute, Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20002 - 2005-12-11
affirm the dismissal of Gallego’s claim under Wis. Stat. § 100.18 because a more specific statute, Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20002 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
Miguel Gallego v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
of Gallego’s claim under WIS. STAT. § 100.18 because a more specific statute, WIS. STAT. § 100.183, governs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20002 - 2017-09-21
of Gallego’s claim under WIS. STAT. § 100.18 because a more specific statute, WIS. STAT. § 100.183, governs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20002 - 2017-09-21
Taylor Investment Corporation of Wisconsin v. PLL Marquette, LLC
motion for summary judgment on its contract claim and advised the parties that it would conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4404 - 2005-03-31
motion for summary judgment on its contract claim and advised the parties that it would conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her legal malpractice claim against Charles Hertel and Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27926 - 2014-09-15
appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her legal malpractice claim against Charles Hertel and Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27926 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
denied him a hearing on his claim that he did not understand the terms of his plea bargain. Because Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88220 - 2012-10-15
denied him a hearing on his claim that he did not understand the terms of his plea bargain. Because Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88220 - 2012-10-15