Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18801 - 18810 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18801 - 18810 of 29823 for des.
2009 WI APP 129
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Westphal v. Farmers Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40079 - 2011-02-07
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Westphal v. Farmers Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40079 - 2011-02-07
State v. Outagamie County Board of Adjustment
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13879 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13879 - 2005-03-31
Susan H. Ripple v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.
the motion. ¶6 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4419 - 2005-03-31
the motion. ¶6 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4419 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30554 - 2014-01-28
the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30554 - 2014-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30897 - 2007-11-20
a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30897 - 2007-11-20
State v. John B. Young
the facts of record constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4402 - 2005-03-31
the facts of record constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4402 - 2005-03-31
Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 3
of law that we review de novo. Sands v. Whitnall Sch. Dist., 2008 WI 89, ¶14, __ Wis. 2d __, 754 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35069 - 2009-01-27
of law that we review de novo. Sands v. Whitnall Sch. Dist., 2008 WI 89, ¶14, __ Wis. 2d __, 754 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35069 - 2009-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91216 - 2013-01-02
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91216 - 2013-01-02
State v. Clinton L. Duhm
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6098 - 2005-08-29
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6098 - 2005-08-29