Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18811 - 18820 of 86444 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Tukang Ruangan Ala Vintage Apartemen Margonda Residence 2 Depok.

Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
] On May 2, 1991, the DOT notified the City of Delavan Plan Commission (Plan Commission) that it objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 103
before the notice of appeal was filed. We dismiss the appeal. ¶2 Hendree, an investigator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36813 - 2009-07-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 2, 2025 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017327 - 2025-10-02

[PDF] Brown County v. Jeffrey T.M.
, for a 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5596 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (1999- 2000). Additionally, all further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5007 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Izell W.
-disposition relief. After a bench trial, see WIS. STAT. § No. 03-2997 2 938.31(2) (trials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20

SC Clerk-Ltr
. At the end of the term, the Court had 2 petitions for bypass pending
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87192 - 2012-09-13

[PDF] Robert Waldman v. Greg Rea
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(a) (1997-98). No. 00-1202 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2564 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
under Wis. Stat. §§ 973.19 and 974.02 (2003-04),[1] and Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27436 - 2006-12-18

State v. Steven E. Benz
)(a), Stats. The State contends that the trial court erred in its interpretation of § 343.305(2),[2] which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13221 - 2005-03-31