Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18811 - 18820 of 68502 for did.
Search results 18811 - 18820 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Mario M. Martinez
motion, which Attorney Martinez did not contest. When Attorney Martinez did not file an answer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17404 - 2017-09-21
motion, which Attorney Martinez did not contest. When Attorney Martinez did not file an answer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17404 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
received for fighting with another student. Phillips testified she did not believe juvenile services would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28032 - 2007-02-05
received for fighting with another student. Phillips testified she did not believe juvenile services would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28032 - 2007-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
suppressed because police did not read him his Miranda rights.[2] Dawson further argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105037 - 2013-12-02
suppressed because police did not read him his Miranda rights.[2] Dawson further argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105037 - 2013-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS
an invocation of his right to remain silent. We conclude that Xiong did invoke his right to silence during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55524 - 2010-10-13
an invocation of his right to remain silent. We conclude that Xiong did invoke his right to silence during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55524 - 2010-10-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the bathroom door while he was urinating. Trial counsel did not ask Robinson about his prior convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197321 - 2017-10-04
the bathroom door while he was urinating. Trial counsel did not ask Robinson about his prior convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197321 - 2017-10-04
State v. Marvin D. Clements
the basis for the charges, “he did not know he was violating the restraining order, injunction, or the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3168 - 2005-03-31
the basis for the charges, “he did not know he was violating the restraining order, injunction, or the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3168 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dianne K.
that [ICWA] did not apply, was incorrect, and [he] d[idn’t] intend to revisit the issue.” Thus a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6521 - 2005-03-31
that [ICWA] did not apply, was incorrect, and [he] d[idn’t] intend to revisit the issue.” Thus a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6521 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
asserts the testimony did not establish adverse possession and the evidence did not support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32907 - 2008-06-02
asserts the testimony did not establish adverse possession and the evidence did not support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32907 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
2 The trial court did not expressly say that Stiglitz had made a prima facie showing. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2842 - 2017-09-19
2 The trial court did not expressly say that Stiglitz had made a prima facie showing. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2842 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31