Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18811 - 18820 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 18811 - 18820 of 58510 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Naomi Anderson v. Con/Spec Corporation
for a new trial. The trial court denied all motions and entered judgment in favor of Zappa and against
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11849 - 2017-09-21
for a new trial. The trial court denied all motions and entered judgment in favor of Zappa and against
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11849 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
amount. We conclude the trial court properly disallowed the requested interest payments because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44921 - 2014-09-15
amount. We conclude the trial court properly disallowed the requested interest payments because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44921 - 2014-09-15
Carolyn A. Smiley v. William A. Smiley
a substantial part of his physical placement expenses. She contends that the trial court based the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7796 - 2005-03-31
a substantial part of his physical placement expenses. She contends that the trial court based the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Demetrius Johnson
are whether the trial court erroneously excluded evidence during his trial, No(s). 99-1468-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15600 - 2017-09-21
are whether the trial court erroneously excluded evidence during his trial, No(s). 99-1468-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15600 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Acquire Restoration, Inc., entered after a court trial. Witch contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775483 - 2024-03-13
of Acquire Restoration, Inc., entered after a court trial. Witch contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775483 - 2024-03-13
[PDF]
Vernon County v. Richard J. Peterson
to confuse the burden of proof in the trial court in drunk driving cases with the scope of our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10500 - 2017-09-20
to confuse the burden of proof in the trial court in drunk driving cases with the scope of our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10500 - 2017-09-20
State v. Victor Raygoza
) motion.[1] He claims the trial court erred when it summarily denied his motion. Although Raygoza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7533 - 2005-03-31
) motion.[1] He claims the trial court erred when it summarily denied his motion. Although Raygoza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7533 - 2005-03-31
Navneet Luthar v. Kamini Luthar
not require maintenance if she chose to work more than 70% time. The trial court addressed this issue in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2429 - 2005-03-31
not require maintenance if she chose to work more than 70% time. The trial court addressed this issue in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2429 - 2005-03-31
Merrick's Inc. v. Michael Seubert
was not authorized by law and the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to set it aside. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12838 - 2005-03-31
was not authorized by law and the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to set it aside. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12838 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold A. Kuik
postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. First, Kuik argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3091 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. First, Kuik argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3091 - 2005-03-31