Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18821 - 18830 of 69909 for his.
Search results 18821 - 18830 of 69909 for his.
CA Blank Order
, appeals an order of the circuit court dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109302 - 2014-03-17
, appeals an order of the circuit court dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109302 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. He also appeals an order denying his motion for No. 2012AP2009 2 reconsideration.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98222 - 2014-09-15
motion. He also appeals an order denying his motion for No. 2012AP2009 2 reconsideration.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Roehl to challenge his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132591 - 2017-09-21
has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Roehl to challenge his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132591 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas L. Blonigen
against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19788 - 2005-10-04
against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19788 - 2005-10-04
[PDF]
Barbara L. Davis v. James G. Davis
ordered James to pay child support of $200 per week, or 17% of his gross income if that is higher. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3278 - 2017-09-19
ordered James to pay child support of $200 per week, or 17% of his gross income if that is higher. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3278 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, as a third offense. The only issue is whether Buchholz’s collateral attack on one of his prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38148 - 2014-09-15
, as a third offense. The only issue is whether Buchholz’s collateral attack on one of his prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38148 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Ledbetter, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Ledbetter argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92001 - 2014-09-15
Ledbetter, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Ledbetter argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92001 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s entry of three civil money judgments arising out of unpaid restitution and court costs from his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208090 - 2018-02-02
court’s entry of three civil money judgments arising out of unpaid restitution and court costs from his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208090 - 2018-02-02
State v. Jermaine P.
claims that remarks made during the State's rebuttal closing argument violated his due process right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9339 - 2005-03-31
claims that remarks made during the State's rebuttal closing argument violated his due process right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9339 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court properly denied his claim of ineffective trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27292 - 2014-09-15
the trial court properly denied his claim of ineffective trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27292 - 2014-09-15