Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18831 - 18840 of 30172 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with handcuffs in order to de-escalate the hostile encounter and continue the investigatory stop while ensuring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919511 - 2025-02-26

[PDF] State v. Victor K. Johnson
, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. Lastly, we need not address both Strickland prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5793 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44860 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether these findings satisfy the statutory standards is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207504 - 2018-01-23

[PDF] Norman O. Brown v. Stephen Puckett
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14555 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Beverly Halverson v. PDQ Food Stores, Inc.
record, to which PDQ did not object, and we must conduct our de novo review based on the materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14531 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26614 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Halquist Stone Company, Inc. v. Town of Brothertown Planning and Zoning Committee
. The reviewing court is not required to supply its own factual conclusions through a de novo search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12029 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an assessment is a question of law that we review de novo. Walgreen Co., 311 Wis. 2d 158, ΒΆΒΆ16-17 (alteration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161075 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 26
findings of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35941 - 2014-09-15