Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18841 - 18850 of 51500 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, which retroactively and substantially decreased his parole eligibility, in effect increasing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183195 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
while his new spouse was undergoing cancer treatments. Karen opposed the motion to terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145747 - 2015-08-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
into her condition[,]” and that “she does not appreciate the lingering and long-term effects this has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1113420 - 2026-05-06

[PDF] State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
not receive effective assistance of counsel, Kelley must prove two things: (1) that his lawyer’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12542 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
standards. In order to establish that he did not receive effective assistance of counsel, Kelley must prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12542 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
to effect the treatment plan, the identity of the legal custodian. (Emphasis added.) ¶6 The WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7327 - 2017-09-20

Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. at 529. The supreme court’s treatment of the annexed peninsula as a “distant lakeshore” is consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2815 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joe E. Kremkoski
days unless good cause was shown why the order should not take effect. ¶6 S.S.'s parents informed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25396 - 2006-06-01

[PDF] State v. Sterling Rachwal
credit against the (three-year) sentence it imposed. The effect of the argument, of course, would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13794 - 2014-09-15

Lincoln County v. April G.
likely it is that the conduct is habitual. Additionally, the CHIPS order had little or no effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15890 - 2005-03-31