Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18841 - 18850 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18841 - 18850 of 29823 for des.
Brad Michael L. v. Lee D.
de novo. Id. at 41 n.7, 315 N.W.2d at 708 n.7. Section 767.51(4), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8284 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. at 41 n.7, 315 N.W.2d at 708 n.7. Section 767.51(4), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8284 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 80
is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96270 - 2017-09-21
is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appellant’s brief that this court’s review is de novo because this appeal requires that this court interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606176 - 2023-01-09
appellant’s brief that this court’s review is de novo because this appeal requires that this court interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606176 - 2023-01-09
[PDF]
WI App 142
this right has been violated is a question of law, which we review de novo, but in our review we accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70931 - 2014-09-15
this right has been violated is a question of law, which we review de novo, but in our review we accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70931 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
custody. Mom sought de novo review of the commissioner’s decision. ¶10 The fact-finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195936 - 2017-09-21
custody. Mom sought de novo review of the commissioner’s decision. ¶10 The fact-finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195936 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for whether there was reason to doubt his competency during trial and at sentencing in this case is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303633 - 2020-11-17
for whether there was reason to doubt his competency during trial and at sentencing in this case is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303633 - 2020-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This Court “review[s] a grant of summary judgment de novo.” Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46, 372
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001596 - 2025-08-27
This Court “review[s] a grant of summary judgment de novo.” Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46, 372
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001596 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the injunction. Id., ¶3. Ardell moved for a de novo hearing before the circuit court. Id. N. and Ardell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209166 - 2018-03-06
the injunction. Id., ¶3. Ardell moved for a de novo hearing before the circuit court. Id. N. and Ardell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209166 - 2018-03-06
State v. Lucian Agnello
to historical facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kieffer, 217 Wis. 2d at 541. The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3068 - 2005-03-31
to historical facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kieffer, 217 Wis. 2d at 541. The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3068 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terrance L. Edwards
that a “de facto” mistrial occurred over his objection. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21651 - 2006-03-06
that a “de facto” mistrial occurred over his objection. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21651 - 2006-03-06