Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18851 - 18860 of 30165 for de.
Search results 18851 - 18860 of 30165 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion, should be subject to de novo review.” Citing State v. Johnson, 177 Wis. 2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
conclusion, should be subject to de novo review.” Citing State v. Johnson, 177 Wis. 2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108145 - 2005-05-31
that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108145 - 2005-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The complaint[2] alleged that Wyand-Williams was a student at St. Norbert College in De Pere, Wisconsin. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92234 - 2013-01-28
The complaint[2] alleged that Wyand-Williams was a student at St. Norbert College in De Pere, Wisconsin. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92234 - 2013-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78627 - 2012-02-29
review de novo whether a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78627 - 2012-02-29
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66793 - 2011-06-27
Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66793 - 2011-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
for our de novo review. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27153 - 2006-11-15
for our de novo review. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27153 - 2006-11-15
State v. Virtis A.
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6667 - 2005-05-02
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6667 - 2005-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶19, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119619 - 2014-08-18
of law we review de novo. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶19, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119619 - 2014-08-18
State v. Jermaine V. Dantzler
, 53–54, 429 N.W.2d 110, 112–113 (Ct. App. 1988). This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4044 - 2005-03-31
, 53–54, 429 N.W.2d 110, 112–113 (Ct. App. 1988). This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4044 - 2005-03-31
George T. Markos, Jr. v. William R. Schaller
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243, 247, 448 N.W.2d 13 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5451 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243, 247, 448 N.W.2d 13 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5451 - 2005-03-31