Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18861 - 18870 of 98460 for court records search online.
Search results 18861 - 18870 of 98460 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
The no-merit procedure in some respects provides defendants greater scrutiny of the trial court record than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
The no-merit procedure in some respects provides defendants greater scrutiny of the trial court record than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT,
on a foreign subpoena issued in a civil action by a court of record in a state other than Wisconsin. A copy
/formdisplay/GF-127A.pdf?formNumber=GF-127A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2019-12-03
on a foreign subpoena issued in a civil action by a court of record in a state other than Wisconsin. A copy
/formdisplay/GF-127A.pdf?formNumber=GF-127A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2019-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court’s discretionary ruling if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97786 - 2014-09-15
a circuit court’s discretionary ruling if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97786 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not point to any place in the record where she explained to the court why the e-mails were relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57584 - 2010-12-08
not point to any place in the record where she explained to the court why the e-mails were relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57584 - 2010-12-08
COURT OF APPEALS
[a]ffected the outcome” and because the trial court “did not note on the record [its] reasoning” for ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06
[a]ffected the outcome” and because the trial court “did not note on the record [its] reasoning” for ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 11, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80524 - 2012-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 11, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80524 - 2012-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS
court. His contention is not supported by the record. ¶16 Neal, acting pro se, moved the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65051 - 2011-05-31
court. His contention is not supported by the record. ¶16 Neal, acting pro se, moved the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65051 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court to base its valuation on facts of record. It was within the court’s discretion to maintain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107544 - 2014-01-29
the circuit court to base its valuation on facts of record. It was within the court’s discretion to maintain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107544 - 2014-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
are directly contradicted by the record. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court explained the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75603 - 2011-12-27
are directly contradicted by the record. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court explained the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75603 - 2011-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. We remanded for the court to demonstrate its reasoning on the record. We also directed the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34183 - 2008-09-29
. We remanded for the court to demonstrate its reasoning on the record. We also directed the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34183 - 2008-09-29