Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18861 - 18870 of 29720 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. (citation omitted). Our review is, therefore, de novo. See id. ¶24 If the court determines joinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269526 - 2020-07-14

Interlaken Service Corporation v. Interlaken Condominium Association, Inc.
to the issues in this case is a question of law which we review de novo. See DePratt v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13065 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Indus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189226 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and order a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶3 The De Soto Bank in Crawford County was robbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113730 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 64
de novo, regardless whether the analysis was conducted by the circuit court, see State v. Long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48970 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Marvin E. Marks
of law are to be reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Swartwout, 116 Wis. 2d 380
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16542 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 64
. Stat. § 283.63(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a matter of law we review de novo, regardless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48970 - 2011-02-07

James M. Kernz v. J. L. French Corporation
review de novo. State v. Windom, 169 Wis. 2d 341, 349, 485 N.W.2d 832 (Ct. App. 1992). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5256 - 2005-03-31

2010 WI APP 133
that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. ¶18 We now turn to Jones’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53662 - 2011-08-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant offers a sufficient reason to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88545 - 2012-10-23