Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18871 - 18880 of 40042 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 18871 - 18880 of 40042 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the decision or order from which he is seeking review; (2) A statement setting forth the specific grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
of the decision or order from which he is seeking review; (2) A statement setting forth the specific grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
CA Blank Order
statements he made to police after invoking his right to counsel. The State agreed not to use any statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95632 - 2013-04-15
statements he made to police after invoking his right to counsel. The State agreed not to use any statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95632 - 2013-04-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Panosh
the statements by her mother. ¶3 Panosh testified on his own behalf, denying sexual contact with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24835 - 2017-09-21
the statements by her mother. ¶3 Panosh testified on his own behalf, denying sexual contact with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24835 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
any statements indicating to you that his position regarding consenting to the draw had changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147080 - 2015-08-25
any statements indicating to you that his position regarding consenting to the draw had changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147080 - 2015-08-25
[PDF]
State v. Jerry D. Gragg
The following statement of facts is based on testimony from the motion hearing before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19
The following statement of facts is based on testimony from the motion hearing before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert J.P.
contends that the remark is an incorrect statement of the law. He asserts that if §§ 938.02(10m), 938.12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11873 - 2017-09-21
contends that the remark is an incorrect statement of the law. He asserts that if §§ 938.02(10m), 938.12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11873 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶6 D’Amico then gave a statement in which he admitted that he had argued with the victim when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
. ¶6 D’Amico then gave a statement in which he admitted that he had argued with the victim when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Dockry
of intoxicants on (1) the witness’s statement that Dockry smelled drunk, (2) the unexplained erratic driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2863 - 2017-09-19
of intoxicants on (1) the witness’s statement that Dockry smelled drunk, (2) the unexplained erratic driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2863 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ardie Byrd
? THE DEFENDANT: Yes Byrd claims this statement by the trial court confused him and did not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11212 - 2017-09-19
? THE DEFENDANT: Yes Byrd claims this statement by the trial court confused him and did not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11212 - 2017-09-19
Herbert E. Droste v. David H. Schwarz
The State introduced written statements from Jason Burget, Jacqueline Judkins, George Schneider, Justin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15671 - 2005-03-31
The State introduced written statements from Jason Burget, Jacqueline Judkins, George Schneider, Justin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15671 - 2005-03-31