Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18881 - 18890 of 68502 for did.
Search results 18881 - 18890 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
responded “eggs.” The victim later acknowledged she did not know what the social worker had for breakfast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96349 - 2013-05-06
responded “eggs.” The victim later acknowledged she did not know what the social worker had for breakfast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96349 - 2013-05-06
Dennis Earl Barnes v. Sauk County
In support of his summary judgment motion, Dr. Bohlmann attested that he did not diagnose any physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25621 - 2006-06-21
In support of his summary judgment motion, Dr. Bohlmann attested that he did not diagnose any physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25621 - 2006-06-21
CA Blank Order
were nasty and criticized her as a person and a mother. She claimed she did not feel “safe enough
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102923 - 2013-10-15
were nasty and criticized her as a person and a mother. She claimed she did not feel “safe enough
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102923 - 2013-10-15
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
appointment with parole agent Michael Rudig on October 22, 2007. Oswald did not call Rudig to explain why he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52316 - 2010-07-19
appointment with parole agent Michael Rudig on October 22, 2007. Oswald did not call Rudig to explain why he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52316 - 2010-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 erroneously exercised its discretion in making this decision because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381976 - 2021-06-29
-CR 2 erroneously exercised its discretion in making this decision because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381976 - 2021-06-29
Kevin B. v. Michael W.E.
, that the trial court did make the required finding of unfitness, and that any deficiency of counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13220 - 2005-03-31
, that the trial court did make the required finding of unfitness, and that any deficiency of counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13220 - 2005-03-31
John J. Surinak v. John Kaishian
. Surinak and Tyre claim that the trial court erred in concluding that: (1) Kaishian did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12064 - 2005-03-31
. Surinak and Tyre claim that the trial court erred in concluding that: (1) Kaishian did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12064 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Derek W. v. Susan K.B.
is applicable. No. 01-1593 5 Answer: Yes …. 2. Did [Susan B.] know, or could she have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4074 - 2017-09-20
is applicable. No. 01-1593 5 Answer: Yes …. 2. Did [Susan B.] know, or could she have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4074 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Penny L. Swanson
prepared by a Kenosha police detective did not support a probable cause determination and that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19
prepared by a Kenosha police detective did not support a probable cause determination and that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19