Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18891 - 18900 of 83447 for case codes/1000.
Search results 18891 - 18900 of 83447 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This case has appeared before three different circuit court judges: Judge Gary Langhoff, Judge L. Edward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82231 - 2014-09-15
This case has appeared before three different circuit court judges: Judge Gary Langhoff, Judge L. Edward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82231 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Deffke
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. No. 96-0154-CR -2- I. BACKGROUND This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. No. 96-0154-CR -2- I. BACKGROUND This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
offense, and had cases pending in Iron, Ashland, Bayfield, and Rusk Counties. Hoeft sent a letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30222 - 2014-09-15
offense, and had cases pending in Iron, Ashland, Bayfield, and Rusk Counties. Hoeft sent a letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30222 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County Case No. 2015CF2119, the State charged Allen with one count of battery by a person subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195964 - 2017-09-21
County Case No. 2015CF2119, the State charged Allen with one count of battery by a person subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195964 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his probation in this case, the circuit court “lacked authority,” based on Drinkwater v. State, 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533541 - 2022-06-16
of his probation in this case, the circuit court “lacked authority,” based on Drinkwater v. State, 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533541 - 2022-06-16