Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18891 - 18900 of 34007 for dismissal.
Search results 18891 - 18900 of 34007 for dismissal.
[PDF]
Brandon Hill v. Patricia A. Butler
claims court commissioner dismissed the case against Patricia Butler because she was the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6362 - 2017-09-19
claims court commissioner dismissed the case against Patricia Butler because she was the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6362 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
intercourse with a child age sixteen or older was dismissed and read in at sentencing.[1] Appointed appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146731 - 2015-08-25
intercourse with a child age sixteen or older was dismissed and read in at sentencing.[1] Appointed appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146731 - 2015-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the two other pending cases were dismissed and read-in for sentencing purposes; and the parties jointly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601151 - 2022-12-15
in the two other pending cases were dismissed and read-in for sentencing purposes; and the parties jointly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601151 - 2022-12-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for criminal trespass was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694874 - 2023-08-24
for criminal trespass was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694874 - 2023-08-24
CA Blank Order
and, as such, the injunction petition should have been dismissed because the de novo hearing was not held within thirty days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132787 - 2015-01-13
and, as such, the injunction petition should have been dismissed because the de novo hearing was not held within thirty days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132787 - 2015-01-13
Rule Order
)(a), is dismissed. Dated at Madison, Wisconsin, this 24th day of November, 2009. BY THE COURT: David R
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43948 - 2009-11-23
)(a), is dismissed. Dated at Madison, Wisconsin, this 24th day of November, 2009. BY THE COURT: David R
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43948 - 2009-11-23
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
of the home contracting charges. The remaining counts were dismissed, but they were read in for restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
of the home contracting charges. The remaining counts were dismissed, but they were read in for restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
State v. Collin D. Jones
maximum imprisonment. (Ten years as a Class C felon with the repeater dismissed versus eight years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11415 - 2005-03-31
maximum imprisonment. (Ten years as a Class C felon with the repeater dismissed versus eight years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the imposition of sex offender treatment rules was a violation of the plea agreement that dismissed the sex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171781 - 2017-09-21
that the imposition of sex offender treatment rules was a violation of the plea agreement that dismissed the sex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171781 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were dismissed outright. The Human Services Department and defense counsel recommended a year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187471 - 2017-09-21
were dismissed outright. The Human Services Department and defense counsel recommended a year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187471 - 2017-09-21