Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18901 - 18910 of 68502 for did.
Search results 18901 - 18910 of 68502 for did.
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
about the situation. But [T.C.B.] don’t lie. Trial counsel did not object
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
about the situation. But [T.C.B.] don’t lie. Trial counsel did not object
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he did not have a defense of mistake to the victim intimidation charge. After an evidentiary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341462 - 2021-03-03
that he did not have a defense of mistake to the victim intimidation charge. After an evidentiary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341462 - 2021-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not address the seriousness of the charges or the general ranges of penalties for the charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691522 - 2023-08-16
did not address the seriousness of the charges or the general ranges of penalties for the charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691522 - 2023-08-16
State v. Peter J. Bartram
that because the State did not present any evidence at the motion hearing, the State failed to meet its burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
that because the State did not present any evidence at the motion hearing, the State failed to meet its burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark Cianciolo
,” and, alternatively, that Cianciolo's alleged mental illness did not justify sentence modification even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8114 - 2005-03-31
,” and, alternatively, that Cianciolo's alleged mental illness did not justify sentence modification even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8114 - 2005-03-31
State v. Fernando R. Salinas
record. We conclude that the court did not do so, and therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20482 - 2005-12-05
record. We conclude that the court did not do so, and therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20482 - 2005-12-05
State v. Penny L. Swanson
for search warrant prepared by a Kenosha police detective did not support a probable cause determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8845 - 2005-03-31
for search warrant prepared by a Kenosha police detective did not support a probable cause determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8845 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Boerner v. Reliance National Indemnity Company
and that she did not see any ice or snow on the sidewalk. She also stated that when she went out for mail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12642 - 2005-03-31
and that she did not see any ice or snow on the sidewalk. She also stated that when she went out for mail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12642 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antroy T. McGee
at the plea colloquy (i.e., a prima facie Bangert violation), and further alleges that he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
at the plea colloquy (i.e., a prima facie Bangert violation), and further alleges that he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20