Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18901 - 18910 of 61137 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 18901 - 18910 of 61137 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process when it withheld exculpatory evidence. ¶3 In the motion, Stallings claimed that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522082 - 2022-05-17
process when it withheld exculpatory evidence. ¶3 In the motion, Stallings claimed that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522082 - 2022-05-17
[PDF]
John Bularz v. Paul Hinkfuss
’ legal malpractice claim against Hinkfuss arises out of representation provided in two separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6176 - 2017-09-19
’ legal malpractice claim against Hinkfuss arises out of representation provided in two separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6176 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report addresses Hayes’s claims that the security video that the police obtained from the gas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285410 - 2020-09-09
no-merit report addresses Hayes’s claims that the security video that the police obtained from the gas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285410 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Julius M. Covington
appealed, claiming that the circuit court erred in permitting his second attorney to withdraw. Covington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25086 - 2017-09-21
appealed, claiming that the circuit court erred in permitting his second attorney to withdraw. Covington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25086 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Bill K. Edwards appeals from a judgment dismissing on summary judgment his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84028 - 2012-06-26
PER CURIAM. Bill K. Edwards appeals from a judgment dismissing on summary judgment his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84028 - 2012-06-26
State v. Dale W. Repinski
concludes that: (1) Repinski waived his claim that his counsel failed to object to the district attorney's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10182 - 2005-03-31
concludes that: (1) Repinski waived his claim that his counsel failed to object to the district attorney's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10182 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, there was no physical evidence appropriate for DNA testing.[5] We affirm the trial court’s denial of Wingo’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33698 - 2008-08-11
, there was no physical evidence appropriate for DNA testing.[5] We affirm the trial court’s denial of Wingo’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33698 - 2008-08-11
Sujan Singh Chada v. First Specialty Insurance Corporation
Specialty Insurance Corporation (First Specialty) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Chada claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12835 - 2005-03-31
Specialty Insurance Corporation (First Specialty) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Chada claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12835 - 2005-03-31
Max Gendelman v. Armando Gollaz
, Gendelman specifically maintained “the right to determine whether a claim shall be placed in litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11663 - 2005-03-31
, Gendelman specifically maintained “the right to determine whether a claim shall be placed in litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11663 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
bends to circumvent an abandoned manhole. The Wises claim they were not given notice that the lateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147217 - 2015-08-24
bends to circumvent an abandoned manhole. The Wises claim they were not given notice that the lateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147217 - 2015-08-24