Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18911 - 18920 of 68502 for did.
Search results 18911 - 18920 of 68502 for did.
State v. Dave Burton
Committee did not comply with departmental procedure rules, and therefore the committee's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31
Committee did not comply with departmental procedure rules, and therefore the committee's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony A. Suslick
determined that while he was mentally ill at the time of the crimes, he did not meet the other criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2836 - 2005-03-31
determined that while he was mentally ill at the time of the crimes, he did not meet the other criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2836 - 2005-03-31
Jesus Barbary v. James R. Sturm
an initial determination that the evidence available did not establish misconduct and held him eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10989 - 2005-03-31
an initial determination that the evidence available did not establish misconduct and held him eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10989 - 2005-03-31
Rohini Avvaru v. Gerald D. O'Marro
O’Marro because he did not timely answer their complaint. We reverse and remand for further fact-finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11023 - 2005-03-31
O’Marro because he did not timely answer their complaint. We reverse and remand for further fact-finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11023 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
responded “eggs.” The victim later acknowledged she did not know what the social worker had for breakfast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96349 - 2013-05-06
responded “eggs.” The victim later acknowledged she did not know what the social worker had for breakfast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96349 - 2013-05-06
Dennis Earl Barnes v. Sauk County
In support of his summary judgment motion, Dr. Bohlmann attested that he did not diagnose any physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25621 - 2006-06-21
In support of his summary judgment motion, Dr. Bohlmann attested that he did not diagnose any physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25621 - 2006-06-21
CA Blank Order
were nasty and criticized her as a person and a mother. She claimed she did not feel “safe enough
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102923 - 2013-10-15
were nasty and criticized her as a person and a mother. She claimed she did not feel “safe enough
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102923 - 2013-10-15
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
appointment with parole agent Michael Rudig on October 22, 2007. Oswald did not call Rudig to explain why he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52316 - 2010-07-19
appointment with parole agent Michael Rudig on October 22, 2007. Oswald did not call Rudig to explain why he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52316 - 2010-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 erroneously exercised its discretion in making this decision because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381976 - 2021-06-29
-CR 2 erroneously exercised its discretion in making this decision because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381976 - 2021-06-29