Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18911 - 18920 of 68502 for did.
Search results 18911 - 18920 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, in the vaginal swab. The testimony did not clarify whether the dried secretion was sperm or DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73904 - 2014-09-15
, in the vaginal swab. The testimony did not clarify whether the dried secretion was sperm or DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Smith’s letter did not constitute a new factor because the sentence was not based on whether or not Bell
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
that Smith’s letter did not constitute a new factor because the sentence was not based on whether or not Bell
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sixteen years of age to go into a vehicle for the purpose of having sexual contact and that he “did acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817982 - 2024-06-25
sixteen years of age to go into a vehicle for the purpose of having sexual contact and that he “did acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817982 - 2024-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
with the involved properties. The court concluded that the summary judgment record did not establish genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28412 - 2007-03-13
with the involved properties. The court concluded that the summary judgment record did not establish genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28412 - 2007-03-13
State v. Edward D. Werchowski
Werchowski's conviction. We first conclude that trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9992 - 2005-03-31
Werchowski's conviction. We first conclude that trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9992 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antroy T. McGee
at the plea colloquy (i.e., a prima facie Bangert violation), and further alleges that he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
at the plea colloquy (i.e., a prima facie Bangert violation), and further alleges that he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
Mark Armbruster v. David M. Counard
, Mr. Armbruster replied that he did not have any of the bills (he said that he gave them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10798 - 2005-03-31
, Mr. Armbruster replied that he did not have any of the bills (he said that he gave them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
their positions. No. 2009AP91-CR 3 his low beams when he struck Weber and the beams did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41508 - 2014-09-15
their positions. No. 2009AP91-CR 3 his low beams when he struck Weber and the beams did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41508 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Stephen Pritchard
test in violation of § 343.305, STATS. Pritchard contends that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8478 - 2017-09-19
test in violation of § 343.305, STATS. Pritchard contends that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8478 - 2017-09-19
Caren C. v. Robin M.
to Caren, whether Caren was at fault or not begs the question. The fact is that Robin did not know how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3699 - 2005-03-31
to Caren, whether Caren was at fault or not begs the question. The fact is that Robin did not know how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3699 - 2005-03-31