Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18911 - 18920 of 69819 for hi.
Search results 18911 - 18920 of 69819 for hi.
State v. Christopher Hamilton
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14204 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14204 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger S. Walker
from a judgment of conviction entered against him after a jury trial, and from the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3061 - 2017-09-19
from a judgment of conviction entered against him after a jury trial, and from the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3061 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael L. Kearney
this testimony infringed upon his constitutional right to present a defense and warrants a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15010 - 2005-03-31
this testimony infringed upon his constitutional right to present a defense and warrants a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15010 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. Hughes argues that the prosecutor’s remarks during sentencing breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
denying his postconviction motion. Hughes argues that the prosecutor’s remarks during sentencing breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
State v. Charles L., Sr.
¶1 KESSLER, J. 1 Charles L., Sr. (hereafter, “Charles”), appeals from the order terminating his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19042 - 2017-09-21
¶1 KESSLER, J. 1 Charles L., Sr. (hereafter, “Charles”), appeals from the order terminating his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19042 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Elton L. Eaton
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He raises two issues for review: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10905 - 2017-09-20
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He raises two issues for review: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10905 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. John Doe
(2001-02). 2 He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. The defendant argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7396 - 2017-09-20
(2001-02). 2 He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. The defendant argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7396 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Frank Jude Steffes
for an investigatory stop, it denied Steffes’ motion, reasoning that his failure to properly signal three turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6232 - 2017-09-19
for an investigatory stop, it denied Steffes’ motion, reasoning that his failure to properly signal three turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6232 - 2017-09-19
State v. William H. Roberts
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4090 - 2005-03-31
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4090 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
park where they were parked.” Feeling it was his role as a deputy “to see if everything’s okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164829 - 2017-09-21
park where they were parked.” Feeling it was his role as a deputy “to see if everything’s okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164829 - 2017-09-21