Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18911 - 18920 of 20937 for word.

John P. Morris v. Employe Trust Funds Board
to the present wording of the statute. Id. The agency's interpretation of the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7823 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
have committed the crime, directly or indirectly? In other words, does the evidence create
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241187 - 2019-05-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statements were therefore voluntary. See Hoppe, 261 Wis. 2d 294, ¶34. In other words, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=930174 - 2025-03-20

Thomas R. Ward v. Town of Nashville
tree” argument. In other words, the only actions Ward seeks to void are the preliminary steps that led
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2481 - 2005-03-31

Hope J. Ellsworth v. Mark A. Schelbrock
and necessarily rendered in this case. In other words, the measure of damages is not what the highest payor would
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17358 - 2005-03-31

Providence Catholic School v. Bristol School District No. 1
of the word “attend” to interpret the statute, we disagree and find the issue’s resolution in the statute’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14820 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard L. Bowers
does the plea agreement say about consecutive versus concurrent sentences? Nothing. Not a word. From
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7476 - 2005-05-09

[PDF] WI App 21
to prompt an investigation sufficient to protect the defendant’s interests—where, in other words, only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350825 - 2021-05-10

[PDF] State v. Bruce Phillips
a decision on bindover. Phillips, focusing on the word “examination,” contends that the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16281 - 2017-09-21

State v. Adam W. Matthews
the word “only.” See id. at 204-05. Instead, it simply restates prior Supreme Court precedent recognizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3424 - 2005-03-31