Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18921 - 18930 of 64202 for records.
Search results 18921 - 18930 of 64202 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not expressly make a finding on the record that there was a factual basis for the charges.3 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
not expressly make a finding on the record that there was a factual basis for the charges.3 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18
to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit reports and response, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
consideration of the no-merit reports and response, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
and is supported by substantial evidence in the record, and therefore it must be affirmed. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4103 - 2017-09-20
and is supported by substantial evidence in the record, and therefore it must be affirmed. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4103 - 2017-09-20
State v. Daniel R. Parsley
adults who did not testify but whom Parsley attempts to implicate, he directs us to nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5608 - 2005-03-31
adults who did not testify but whom Parsley attempts to implicate, he directs us to nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5608 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerome L. Thoms
(PSI) and because counsel failed to present witnesses at the hearing. The record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15297 - 2017-09-21
(PSI) and because counsel failed to present witnesses at the hearing. The record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15297 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of perjury. ¶20 As another example, assume that a party seeks to admit business records under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183374 - 2017-09-21
of perjury. ¶20 As another example, assume that a party seeks to admit business records under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183374 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit reports and response, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
consideration of the no-merit reports and response, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
Robert A. Armbruster v. Douglas Fitzgerald
. After conferring with the parties off the record, the court summarized the case status.[2] The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3987 - 2005-03-31
. After conferring with the parties off the record, the court summarized the case status.[2] The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3987 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision.” Randall v. Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision.” Randall v. Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28