Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18931 - 18940 of 61989 for child support.

COURT OF APPEALS
“that a neighbor was at the residence with a gun and a child was requesting an ambulance for unknown spray in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54895 - 2010-09-27

State v. Peter A. Moss
or the minor child. Moss conceded that the same types of goods sold in the store were in the storage unit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jessica L. Mettler v. Debra L. Nellis
and an exception to the equine immunity statute applied. In support of their argument on equine immunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7490 - 2017-09-20

Kimberly Kirwin Holum v. General Motors Corporation
not agree. The trial court established the following criteria: the accident had to involve a child roughly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13124 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John Lee Doll
with him. In addition, there was physical evidence to support the victim’s testimony. ¶12 Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16326 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, causing mental harm to a child, and two counts of felony bail jumping. His pretrial motion to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202170 - 2017-11-15

COURT OF APPEALS
was the only witness called in support of her case. Among other things, Tenesha testified that she used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86702 - 2012-09-04

State v. Matthew R.L.
. Each of these determinations was supported by evidence in the record, and this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 9
the aggravating factors, which would have supported the imposition of a private reprimand. Nonetheless, he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=937389 - 2025-04-08

D.C. v. Catholic Diocese of Green Bay
, not merely conclusions, must be made in an affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment. Kroske v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10174 - 2005-03-31