Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18931 - 18940 of 29817 for des.
Search results 18931 - 18940 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Lucian Agnello
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kieffer, 217 Wis. 2d at 541. The State has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3068 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kieffer, 217 Wis. 2d at 541. The State has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3068 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50650 - 2010-07-15
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50650 - 2010-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Thiel
is a policy question for the appellate court that we review de novo. See Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15093 - 2017-09-21
is a policy question for the appellate court that we review de novo. See Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15093 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dean Garfoot
a proper legal determination as to Garfoot's competence. Applying a de novo standard of review, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16922 - 2005-03-31
a proper legal determination as to Garfoot's competence. Applying a de novo standard of review, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16922 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 267
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶13 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30755 - 2014-09-15
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶13 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30755 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Terrance L. Edwards
placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense. He argues that a “de facto” mistrial occurred over his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21651 - 2017-09-21
placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense. He argues that a “de facto” mistrial occurred over his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21651 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward F. Topping
to the undisputed facts of this case presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Koeppen I, 195 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3633 - 2005-03-31
to the undisputed facts of this case presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Koeppen I, 195 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but review its application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo. State v. Smiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95165 - 2014-09-15
, but review its application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo. State v. Smiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95165 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 256
, and our review is de novo.” Id. Further, whether a defendant was denied the constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30828 - 2014-09-15
, and our review is de novo.” Id. Further, whether a defendant was denied the constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30828 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶11. ¶49
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102719 - 2013-10-07
). Whether a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶11. ¶49
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102719 - 2013-10-07