Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18941 - 18950 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 18941 - 18950 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
was so much less than the sentence imposed against Her’s co-defendant and that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30097 - 2014-09-15
was so much less than the sentence imposed against Her’s co-defendant and that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30097 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John J. Surinak v. John Kaishian
. John J. Surinak and Timothy E. Tyre appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12248 - 2017-09-21
. John J. Surinak and Timothy E. Tyre appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12248 - 2017-09-21
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
regarding the easement. ¶3 After a trial to the court, the court granted judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4418 - 2005-03-31
regarding the easement. ¶3 After a trial to the court, the court granted judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4418 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Nelson
on the grounds that the pleas were involuntary and his trial counsel was ineffective. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2736 - 2005-03-31
on the grounds that the pleas were involuntary and his trial counsel was ineffective. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2736 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
both his trial and appellate counsel. We conclude Roalson’s motion did not contain sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213892 - 2018-06-05
both his trial and appellate counsel. We conclude Roalson’s motion did not contain sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213892 - 2018-06-05
State v. Randal H. Kuhnke
) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it excluded a statement against interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9329 - 2005-03-31
) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it excluded a statement against interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9329 - 2005-03-31
Judith Kay Briggs v. Donald James Briggs
for an additional ten years thereafter, to his former wife, Judith Briggs.[1] He argues that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6150 - 2005-03-31
for an additional ten years thereafter, to his former wife, Judith Briggs.[1] He argues that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6150 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
regarding the easement. ¶3 After a trial to the court, the court granted judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4418 - 2017-09-19
regarding the easement. ¶3 After a trial to the court, the court granted judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4418 - 2017-09-19
Elizabeth Tooke v. Robert Tooke
discovered the special assessments and asked the trial court to order Robert to pay them. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8955 - 2005-03-31
discovered the special assessments and asked the trial court to order Robert to pay them. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 948.22(2), the trial court withheld sentence and ordered a six-year term of probation. In September
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125232 - 2017-09-21
. § 948.22(2), the trial court withheld sentence and ordered a six-year term of probation. In September
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125232 - 2017-09-21