Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18951 - 18960 of 61989 for child support.

State v. Peter A. Moss
or the minor child. Moss conceded that the same types of goods sold in the store were in the storage unit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jessica L. Mettler v. Debra L. Nellis
and an exception to the equine immunity statute applied. In support of their argument on equine immunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7490 - 2017-09-20

Kimberly Kirwin Holum v. General Motors Corporation
not agree. The trial court established the following criteria: the accident had to involve a child roughly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13124 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John Lee Doll
with him. In addition, there was physical evidence to support the victim’s testimony. ¶12 Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16326 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, causing mental harm to a child, and two counts of felony bail jumping. His pretrial motion to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202170 - 2017-11-15

COURT OF APPEALS
was the only witness called in support of her case. Among other things, Tenesha testified that she used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86702 - 2012-09-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-delayed woman with the mental capacity of a five or six-year-old child, disclosed to a family member
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605810 - 2023-01-04

State v. Matthew R.L.
. Each of these determinations was supported by evidence in the record, and this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 9
the aggravating factors, which would have supported the imposition of a private reprimand. Nonetheless, he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=937389 - 2025-04-08

D.C. v. Catholic Diocese of Green Bay
, not merely conclusions, must be made in an affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment. Kroske v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10174 - 2005-03-31