Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18951 - 18960 of 98460 for court records search online.
Search results 18951 - 18960 of 98460 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
waived them, the Record supports the opposite conclusion. The court noted that Detective Ortiz took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57484 - 2010-12-06
waived them, the Record supports the opposite conclusion. The court noted that Detective Ortiz took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57484 - 2010-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court if there is a reasonable basis in the record for the court’s decision. Hacker v. Hacker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45689 - 2010-01-11
the circuit court if there is a reasonable basis in the record for the court’s decision. Hacker v. Hacker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45689 - 2010-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
expenses resulting from the contemptuous letter. This court concludes, based on the review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30557 - 2007-10-09
expenses resulting from the contemptuous letter. This court concludes, based on the review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30557 - 2007-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
, the record indicates that the circuit court was never presented with this argument, and Ornes fails to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63617 - 2011-05-04
, the record indicates that the circuit court was never presented with this argument, and Ornes fails to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63617 - 2011-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court does not “presume facts not of record” or ask whether the court could “‘reasonably conceive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116718 - 2014-07-09
, the court does not “presume facts not of record” or ask whether the court could “‘reasonably conceive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116718 - 2014-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
was a Class H felony. Martin further asserted the sentencing court’s questions about Hill’s record “show[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107102 - 2014-01-21
was a Class H felony. Martin further asserted the sentencing court’s questions about Hill’s record “show[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107102 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
received in evidence by the court. It is the appellant’s duty to make sure that the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50773 - 2010-06-08
received in evidence by the court. It is the appellant’s duty to make sure that the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50773 - 2010-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
survey map had in fact been properly recorded. Springvale cross-appeals the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29934 - 2007-08-08
survey map had in fact been properly recorded. Springvale cross-appeals the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29934 - 2007-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
Further, a review of the record indicates the circuit court was not responsible for any significant delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
Further, a review of the record indicates the circuit court was not responsible for any significant delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the victim. As aptly explained by the trial court, while “[t]here is some evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34377 - 2008-10-22
the victim. As aptly explained by the trial court, while “[t]here is some evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34377 - 2008-10-22