Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18951 - 18960 of 29823 for des.

State v. Donald D. Marshall
the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3998 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jerry W. Sample
, a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Sostre, 198 Wis. 2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17137 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=495378 - 2022-03-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler and Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179220 - 2017-09-21

State v. Glover B. Jones
(footnote omitted). We review a trial court’s denial of a defendant’s motion for a Franks hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3996 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
jurisdiction over a defendant under WIS. STAT. § 801.05 is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50221 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 95
of an insurance policy, which is generally subject to de novo review. Welin v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102601 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
DISCUSSION Standard of Review ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27982 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
was the only reasonable remedy. ¶12 We review an appeal from a summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34412 - 2014-09-15

Interlaken Service Corporation v. Interlaken Condominium Association, Inc.
to the issues in this case is a question of law which we review de novo. See DePratt v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13065 - 2005-03-31