Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18961 - 18970 of 83454 for case code.
Search results 18961 - 18970 of 83454 for case code.
COURT OF APPEALS
personal capacity in connection with a lawsuit filed by his former business partner (“the Bishop case”).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36186 - 2009-04-15
personal capacity in connection with a lawsuit filed by his former business partner (“the Bishop case”).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36186 - 2009-04-15
[PDF]
State v. Kimberly Sotelo
Belton2 bright-line rule, the police officer's search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9223 - 2017-09-19
Belton2 bright-line rule, the police officer's search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9223 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of State Public Defenders v. Circuit Court for Dunn County
sanction. This case arises out of a circuit court action, State v. Creaser, No. 97-CF-119, in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14125 - 2014-09-15
sanction. This case arises out of a circuit court action, State v. Creaser, No. 97-CF-119, in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14125 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.[2] ¶3 In the present case, RTS sued Group to recover on a $67,500 promissory note, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
.[2] ¶3 In the present case, RTS sued Group to recover on a $67,500 promissory note, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
George Harrison v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1795 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11010 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1795 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11010 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1100535 - 2026-04-07
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1100535 - 2026-04-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
., 2004 WI 112, ¶30, 275 Wis. 2d 1, 683 N.W.2d 58. In this case, the court was required to base its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55525 - 2014-09-15
., 2004 WI 112, ¶30, 275 Wis. 2d 1, 683 N.W.2d 58. In this case, the court was required to base its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55525 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
PER CURIAM. This case comes before us on remand from the supreme court. On October 21, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4233 - 2017-09-19
PER CURIAM. This case comes before us on remand from the supreme court. On October 21, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4233 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as potential witnesses during its case-in-chief. ¶6 The State’s first witness, the phlebotomist who took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68451 - 2014-09-15
as potential witnesses during its case-in-chief. ¶6 The State’s first witness, the phlebotomist who took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68451 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
representation of Thomas in this case. For that reason, she contends the circuit court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232745 - 2019-01-15
representation of Thomas in this case. For that reason, she contends the circuit court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232745 - 2019-01-15