Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18961 - 18970 of 82684 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 18961 - 18970 of 82684 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
State v. William E. Hall
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Ozaukee County: THOMAS R. WOLFGRAM, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Ozaukee County: THOMAS R. WOLFGRAM, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP2373-CRNM 2019AP2374-CRNM State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455923 - 2021-11-23
entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP2373-CRNM 2019AP2374-CRNM State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455923 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the following opinion and order: 2016AP120 State of Wisconsin v. Ervin Thomas (L.C. # 2009CF3972
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186406 - 2017-09-21
the following opinion and order: 2016AP120 State of Wisconsin v. Ervin Thomas (L.C. # 2009CF3972
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186406 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jesus Barbary
erroneously exercised its discretion in not ordering a competency exam or in not appointing counsel because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11590 - 2017-09-19
erroneously exercised its discretion in not ordering a competency exam or in not appointing counsel because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11590 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jesus Barbary
discretion in not ordering a competency exam or in not appointing counsel because of Barbary’s incompetency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
discretion in not ordering a competency exam or in not appointing counsel because of Barbary’s incompetency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 90
from an order of the circuit court for Dodge County, Richard O. Wright, Judge. Reversed and cause
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33386 - 2014-09-15
from an order of the circuit court for Dodge County, Richard O. Wright, Judge. Reversed and cause
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33386 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. STEPHEN A. BROAD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47976 - 2014-09-15
. STEPHEN A. BROAD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47976 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. GRIFFIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33056 - 2014-09-15
. GRIFFIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33056 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 17, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47976 - 2010-03-16
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47976 - 2010-03-16
State v. Philip M. Canon
of appeals, in a split decision, affirmed the order of the circuit court. I ¶3 The facts are undisputed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17463 - 2005-03-31
of appeals, in a split decision, affirmed the order of the circuit court. I ¶3 The facts are undisputed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17463 - 2005-03-31