Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18961 - 18970 of 74615 for public records.

State v. John J. Watson
over the phone,” and concluded that the public-records exception “does not allow admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8930 - 2014-02-03

State v. Michael L. Washington
to the pertinent parts of the record and argue for the statement's admission himself. In addition, Washington's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9770 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a public records request that she had made for records documenting police responses to the DNR parking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564669 - 2022-09-09

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric K. Graf
records from the School District under the Wisconsin public records law. This legal advice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16661 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric K. Graf
, with instructions as to how she could obtain relevant records from the School District under the Wisconsin public
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16661 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176951 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Roslyn L. Braverman v. Columbia Hospital, Inc.
records relating to Columbia’s quality assurance procedures. The trial court issued the protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2449 - 2017-09-19

Roslyn L. Braverman v. Columbia Hospital, Inc.
certain records relating to Columbia’s quality assurance procedures. The trial court issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2449 - 2007-07-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242086 - 2019-06-19

[PDF] 2025XX001438 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Crawford)
Fourteenth Amendment. Judicial recusal standards exist to safeguard judicial impartiality and public trust
/supreme/docs/25xx1438crawford.pdf - 2025-11-25