Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18961 - 18970 of 76892 for see.
Search results 18961 - 18970 of 76892 for see.
CA Blank Order
Verkilen, has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110338 - 2014-04-10
Verkilen, has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110338 - 2014-04-10
State v. Lawrence P. Sajdik
an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8224 - 2005-03-31
an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8224 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529908 - 2022-06-08
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529908 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025974 - 2025-10-23
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025974 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865682 - 2024-10-23
with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865682 - 2024-10-23
CA Blank Order
that the circuit court’s sentencing decision had a “rational and explainable basis.” See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109957 - 2014-04-08
that the circuit court’s sentencing decision had a “rational and explainable basis.” See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109957 - 2014-04-08
State v. Jason Luepke
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Janet A. Baker v. Larry F. Schock
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10926 - 2017-09-20
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10926 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12),[1] and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101469 - 2013-08-26
seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12),[1] and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101469 - 2013-08-26
Eugene F. Olsen v. Daniel R. Bertrand
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15024 - 2005-03-31
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15024 - 2005-03-31