Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 30172 for de.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 30172 for de.
State v. Terrance L. Edwards
that a “de facto” mistrial occurred over his objection. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21651 - 2006-03-06
that a “de facto” mistrial occurred over his objection. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21651 - 2006-03-06
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Daniel Burr
a judge was a “neutral and detached magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5949 - 2017-09-19
a judge was a “neutral and detached magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5949 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
this court reviews de novo. State v. Lesik¸ 2010 WI App 12, ¶6, 322 Wis. 2d 753, 780 N.W.2d 210 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99899 - 2013-07-24
this court reviews de novo. State v. Lesik¸ 2010 WI App 12, ¶6, 322 Wis. 2d 753, 780 N.W.2d 210 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99899 - 2013-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766813 - 2024-02-21
a circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766813 - 2024-02-21
[PDF]
James R. Schofield v. Raymond E. Smith
of Review. ¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5864 - 2017-09-19
of Review. ¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5864 - 2017-09-19
2006 WI APP 226
review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26930 - 2006-11-20
review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26930 - 2006-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
. DISCUSSION Standard of Review ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27982 - 2007-01-30
. DISCUSSION Standard of Review ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27982 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
WI App 59
review the interpretation and application of this statute de novo. Ozuna, 376 Wis. 2d 1, ¶9; Hemp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280581 - 2020-10-13
review the interpretation and application of this statute de novo. Ozuna, 376 Wis. 2d 1, ¶9; Hemp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280581 - 2020-10-13
[PDF]
WI APP 16
as its order granting summary judgment to Wheeler and Lambert.7 Discussion ¶12 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910614 - 2025-04-21
as its order granting summary judgment to Wheeler and Lambert.7 Discussion ¶12 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910614 - 2025-04-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” Microsoft Corp., 389 Wis. 2d 350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306056 - 2020-11-19
by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” Microsoft Corp., 389 Wis. 2d 350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306056 - 2020-11-19