Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 29796 for des.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 29796 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 468, 476, 247 N.W.2d 98 (1976). ¶13 Our review is de novo. Propp v. Sauk Cnty. Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011144 - 2025-09-16
. 2d 468, 476, 247 N.W.2d 98 (1976). ¶13 Our review is de novo. Propp v. Sauk Cnty. Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011144 - 2025-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the defendant is more than de minimis, i.e., more than ‘mere nervousness or excitement or some reluctance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517245 - 2022-05-03
of the defendant is more than de minimis, i.e., more than ‘mere nervousness or excitement or some reluctance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517245 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
WI APP 80
is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96270 - 2017-09-21
is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 84
it.”). Because the relevant facts in this case are undisputed, we review de novo the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152377 - 2017-09-21
it.”). Because the relevant facts in this case are undisputed, we review de novo the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152377 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 267
interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. When we construe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30755 - 2007-12-18
interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. When we construe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30755 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Berry, 369 Wis. 2d 211, ¶9. ¶24 We agree with Richer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367906 - 2021-05-18
is a question of law that we review de novo. Berry, 369 Wis. 2d 211, ¶9. ¶24 We agree with Richer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367906 - 2021-05-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a jury trial on an element was knowing and voluntary is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47300 - 2014-09-15
for a jury trial on an element was knowing and voluntary is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, that it would decide the issue de novo, giving no deference to the decision of the Tax Appeals Commission
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17246 - 2017-09-21
, that it would decide the issue de novo, giving no deference to the decision of the Tax Appeals Commission
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17246 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
. . . [is a] question[] of insurance contract interpretation subject to de novo review." 1325 N. Van Buren, LLC v. T-3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114231 - 2014-06-09
. . . [is a] question[] of insurance contract interpretation subject to de novo review." 1325 N. Van Buren, LLC v. T-3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114231 - 2014-06-09
Merlin Weber v. Town of Saukville
as controlling or persuasive and that we should interpret the term [in question] de novo. Marris v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16943 - 2005-03-31
as controlling or persuasive and that we should interpret the term [in question] de novo. Marris v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16943 - 2005-03-31