Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 76902 for see.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 76902 for see.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We further conclude that we do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645199 - 2023-04-18
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We further conclude that we do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645199 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62850 - 2014-09-15
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62850 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentenced on or after January 1, 2014. See 2013 Wis. Act 20, §§ 2355, 426(1)(am); WIS. STAT. § 973.046(1r
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170463 - 2017-09-21
sentenced on or after January 1, 2014. See 2013 Wis. Act 20, §§ 2355, 426(1)(am); WIS. STAT. § 973.046(1r
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170463 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason Luepke
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2470 - 2017-09-19
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2470 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the statutory minimum penalties of six months’ jail time and a $600 fine.3 See WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(am)5
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375914 - 2021-06-10
with the statutory minimum penalties of six months’ jail time and a $600 fine.3 See WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(am)5
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375914 - 2021-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pleas. See State v. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307, 312, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986). The court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125490 - 2017-09-21
pleas. See State v. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307, 312, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986). The court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125490 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert James Rogers
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 97-1689-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12608 - 2017-09-21
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 97-1689-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12608 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could be raised on appeal. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217651 - 2018-08-09
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could be raised on appeal. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217651 - 2018-08-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025974 - 2025-10-23
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025974 - 2025-10-23
CA Blank Order
sentence. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(9m)(a). The circuit court properly employed summary judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143688 - 2015-06-29
sentence. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(9m)(a). The circuit court properly employed summary judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143688 - 2015-06-29