Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 82084 for simple case.
Search results 18971 - 18980 of 82084 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
by the trial court. The trial court then “[a]djourned” the case. ¶5 On March 31, 2003, eighty-seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2007-07-09
by the trial court. The trial court then “[a]djourned” the case. ¶5 On March 31, 2003, eighty-seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2007-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Wooster
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kyle W.F.
) The county where the juvenile is present. (c) In the case of a violation of state law … the county where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
) The county where the juvenile is present. (c) In the case of a violation of state law … the county where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4661 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4661 - 2005-03-31
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6481 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6481 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leon A. Franklin
in Illinois in 1984, twelve years before the charged crimes in this case. The State offered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12461 - 2005-03-31
in Illinois in 1984, twelve years before the charged crimes in this case. The State offered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12461 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rose Marie Hartfield
in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2 Hartfield, who had a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2 Hartfield, who had a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
State v. Thomas W. Wood
factors are presented.”). ¶8 We hold that the law of new factors governs this case. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15821 - 2005-03-31
factors are presented.”). ¶8 We hold that the law of new factors governs this case. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sherry Mulligan v. Barbara J. Koehler
and Koehler appealed the September 28, 1994, judgment to this court in case number 94-2532. Ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10417 - 2017-09-20
and Koehler appealed the September 28, 1994, judgment to this court in case number 94-2532. Ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10417 - 2017-09-20