Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18981 - 18990 of 36268 for e's.
Search results 18981 - 18990 of 36268 for e's.
State v. Jeremy L. Walker
e. schroeder, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15266 - 2005-03-31
e. schroeder, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15266 - 2005-03-31
State v. Morgan V.
to §752.31(2)(e), Stats. [2] Section 938.18, Stats, provides in part: (5) If prosecutive merit is found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14755 - 2005-03-31
to §752.31(2)(e), Stats. [2] Section 938.18, Stats, provides in part: (5) If prosecutive merit is found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14755 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was a Class F felony, not a Class E felony. The State informed the circuit court that it filed an amended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30
was a Class F felony, not a Class E felony. The State informed the circuit court that it filed an amended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
Leonard Collins v. Marianne A. Cooke
was submitted on the brief of Stan Davis, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15491 - 2017-09-21
was submitted on the brief of Stan Davis, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15491 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. First, “[w]e examine the moving party’s submissions to determine whether they constitute a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101575 - 2017-09-21
. First, “[w]e examine the moving party’s submissions to determine whether they constitute a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101575 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by clear and convincing evidence. See § 51.20(13)(e). When, as here, the County seeks to extend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234358 - 2019-02-05
by clear and convincing evidence. See § 51.20(13)(e). When, as here, the County seeks to extend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234358 - 2019-02-05
State v. Lance Terry Konrath
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: JOSEPH E. WIMMER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10773 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: JOSEPH E. WIMMER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10773 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
OFFICE OF THE CLERK 110 E. MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O. BOX 1688 MADISON
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375598 - 2021-06-07
OFFICE OF THE CLERK 110 E. MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O. BOX 1688 MADISON
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375598 - 2021-06-07
State v. Rodney R. Clark
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Daniel J. O’Brien
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Daniel J. O’Brien
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick R. Bell
. 429, 434-35 (1991) (“[E]ven when officers have no basis for suspecting a particular individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12929 - 2017-09-21
. 429, 434-35 (1991) (“[E]ven when officers have no basis for suspecting a particular individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12929 - 2017-09-21