Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18991 - 19000 of 62336 for child support.

[PDF] State v. Gilbert J. Grobstick
that upon entering the house, a child told him that Grobstick "just went out the back window." Lubinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7844 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was charged with two counts of second-degree sexual assault and one count of sexual assault of a child under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419814 - 2021-09-02

State v. Rick A. Holtz
of conviction for second-degree sexual assault of a child under age sixteen, as a repeat offender. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17829 - 2005-04-26

[PDF] State v. Donald Williams
Moran, supporting the trial court’s position. Therefore, our decision will primarily respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10833 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 100
) and for compliance with s. 303.06(2) and may distribute earnings for the support of the inmate’s or resident’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33019 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Harris D. Byers
. The court concluded that the facts supported the admission and that Byers had entered the admission freely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15994 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a witness in case No. 15CF1796; and (3) second-degree sexual assault of a child in case No. 15CF3344
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231776 - 2019-01-08

State v. Harris D. Byers
that the facts supported the admission and that Byers had entered the admission freely, voluntarily waiving his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard Brown
Moran, supporting the trial court’s position. Therefore, our decision will primarily respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10750 - 2017-09-20

State v. Donald Williams
the statute’s language makes its meaning clear, examples from case law also support our conclusion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10833 - 2005-03-31