Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18991 - 19000 of 29827 for des.
Search results 18991 - 19000 of 29827 for des.
State v. Willie S. Davis
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20259 - 2005-12-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20259 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Herek, 226 Wis. 2d at 510. B. The Department’s pat-down
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195083 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Herek, 226 Wis. 2d at 510. B. The Department’s pat-down
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195083 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 43
now appeal. DISCUSSION ¶16 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244461 - 2019-09-17
now appeal. DISCUSSION ¶16 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244461 - 2019-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a correct statement of the law presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99899 - 2017-09-21
a correct statement of the law presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99899 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Phoenix Contractors, Inc. v. Affiliated Cap. Corp., 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929720 - 2025-03-19
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Phoenix Contractors, Inc. v. Affiliated Cap. Corp., 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929720 - 2025-03-19
[PDF]
WI App 11
findings are clearly erroneous. Second, we conduct an independent, de novo analysis of the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898192 - 2025-03-20
findings are clearly erroneous. Second, we conduct an independent, de novo analysis of the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898192 - 2025-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
and order a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶3 The De Soto Bank in Crawford County was robbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113730 - 2014-06-02
and order a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶3 The De Soto Bank in Crawford County was robbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113730 - 2014-06-02
Kristine D. Geske v. Brian E. Jackson
in the judgment. [10] The record shows that at the November 29 hearing, the commissioner gave the parties “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11752 - 2005-03-31
in the judgment. [10] The record shows that at the November 29 hearing, the commissioner gave the parties “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11752 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50650 - 2010-07-15
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50650 - 2010-07-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
factual findings, then proceeds to the de novo review of its legal conclusions. Here
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382699 - 2021-06-29
factual findings, then proceeds to the de novo review of its legal conclusions. Here
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382699 - 2021-06-29