Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18991 - 19000 of 29721 for des.
Search results 18991 - 19000 of 29721 for des.
State v. Peter A. Moss
.2d 518 (Ct. App. 1988). We review interpretations of statutes de novo. Id. ¶22 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31
.2d 518 (Ct. App. 1988). We review interpretations of statutes de novo. Id. ¶22 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144545 - 2017-09-21
the referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144545 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel Williams
review de novo. State v. Rachel, 224 Wis. 2d 571, 573, 591 N.W.2d 920 (Ct. App. 1999). However, a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2980 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Rachel, 224 Wis. 2d 571, 573, 591 N.W.2d 920 (Ct. App. 1999). However, a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2980 - 2005-03-31
William C. Anderson v. John Mogenson
this court reviews de novo. Miller v. Thomack, 210 Wis.2d 650, 658, 563 N.W.2d 891, 894 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14384 - 2005-03-31
this court reviews de novo. Miller v. Thomack, 210 Wis.2d 650, 658, 563 N.W.2d 891, 894 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts de novo.” Id. ¶13 Dancel contends that the lineup in this case was impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700811 - 2023-09-12
principles to those facts de novo.” Id. ¶13 Dancel contends that the lineup in this case was impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700811 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Keith M. Carey
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6587 - 2017-09-19
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6587 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Alison Laux v. Leonard Lewins
court can make a de novo determination as to whether the statute was correctly applied to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2254 - 2017-09-19
court can make a de novo determination as to whether the statute was correctly applied to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2254 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
reviews de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶4 The double jeopardy provision protects against multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶4 The double jeopardy provision protects against multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
review de novo questions of law involving the application of a statute to a particular set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26778 - 2006-10-11
review de novo questions of law involving the application of a statute to a particular set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26778 - 2006-10-11