Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18991 - 19000 of 68502 for did.
Search results 18991 - 19000 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Richard Stoeckel
to chemical testing. He argues that even though he stated he would not submit to testing, he did not refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5694 - 2017-09-19
to chemical testing. He argues that even though he stated he would not submit to testing, he did not refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5694 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard Stoeckel
to chemical testing. He argues that even though he stated he would not submit to testing, he did not refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5694 - 2005-03-31
to chemical testing. He argues that even though he stated he would not submit to testing, he did not refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5694 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the bathroom door while he was urinating. Trial counsel did not ask Robinson about his prior convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197321 - 2017-10-04
the bathroom door while he was urinating. Trial counsel did not ask Robinson about his prior convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197321 - 2017-10-04
COURT OF APPEALS
” of the premises and did not cover latent or concealed defects. The inspector’s report cited “no major defects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77158 - 2012-10-31
” of the premises and did not cover latent or concealed defects. The inspector’s report cited “no major defects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77158 - 2012-10-31
CA Blank Order
and relevant to be admissible. Hanko also argued that, if § 907.02(1) did not apply to his discharge trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146728 - 2015-08-17
and relevant to be admissible. Hanko also argued that, if § 907.02(1) did not apply to his discharge trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146728 - 2015-08-17
State v. James Stankiewicz
that police did not have reasonable suspicion for an investigative stop after observing him parallel park his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10828 - 2005-03-31
that police did not have reasonable suspicion for an investigative stop after observing him parallel park his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10828 - 2005-03-31
Jesus Barbary v. James R. Sturm
an initial determination that the evidence available did not establish misconduct and held him eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10989 - 2005-03-31
an initial determination that the evidence available did not establish misconduct and held him eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10989 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not explain. Schwind’s probation agent stated that he nonetheless could verbally weigh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208168 - 2018-02-14
did not explain. Schwind’s probation agent stated that he nonetheless could verbally weigh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208168 - 2018-02-14
State v. Dave Burton
Committee did not comply with departmental procedure rules, and therefore the committee's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2014-12-21
Committee did not comply with departmental procedure rules, and therefore the committee's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2014-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
approached Mayek’s vehicle on foot. Rasmussen did not activate his emergency lights or siren, verbally order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86357 - 2012-08-20
approached Mayek’s vehicle on foot. Rasmussen did not activate his emergency lights or siren, verbally order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86357 - 2012-08-20