Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 191 - 200 of 10289 for ed.
Search results 191 - 200 of 10289 for ed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“fail[ed] to consider [his] character and need to protect the public.” He claims “[t]he record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674613 - 2023-07-05
“fail[ed] to consider [his] character and need to protect the public.” He claims “[t]he record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674613 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
State v. Steven M. Wrzesinski
that "the legislature chang[ed] the definition of a child for one purpose and not the other and, therefore, caus[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2367 - 2017-09-19
that "the legislature chang[ed] the definition of a child for one purpose and not the other and, therefore, caus[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2367 - 2017-09-19
State v. Maurice C.
to a penalty.” Oxford English Dictionary 731 (2d ed. 1989). To “stay” an order means to “refrain from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13677 - 2005-03-31
to a penalty.” Oxford English Dictionary 731 (2d ed. 1989). To “stay” an order means to “refrain from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13677 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven M. Wrzesinski
At the hearing, he contended that "the legislature chang[ed] the definition of a child for one purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2367 - 2005-03-31
At the hearing, he contended that "the legislature chang[ed] the definition of a child for one purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
MELISSA A. HUBBARD,
who treat[ed]” Hubbard within the meaning of § 448.30 because she did not actually remove Hubbard’s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961619 - 2025-07-10
who treat[ed]” Hubbard within the meaning of § 448.30 because she did not actually remove Hubbard’s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961619 - 2025-07-10
Frederick J. Sanger v. Barbara L. Sanger
Dictionary 1517 (7th ed. 1999). ¶5 Where, as here, we are called upon to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6384 - 2005-03-31
Dictionary 1517 (7th ed. 1999). ¶5 Where, as here, we are called upon to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frederick J. Sanger v. Barbara L. Sanger
of an entreaty or recommendation rather than a positive command.” BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1517 (7th ed. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6384 - 2017-09-19
of an entreaty or recommendation rather than a positive command.” BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1517 (7th ed. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6384 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[have] bump[ed] it.” Hessling testified that when he spoke with his father during a phone call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887963 - 2024-12-11
[have] bump[ed] it.” Hessling testified that when he spoke with his father during a phone call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887963 - 2024-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
placed on probation, “right off the bat” she “abscond[ed], fail[ed] to report for scheduled visits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65189 - 2011-05-31
placed on probation, “right off the bat” she “abscond[ed], fail[ed] to report for scheduled visits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65189 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 16-02A appendix
§ 33 at 205, n. 5 (7 th ed.). Prior editions used the same language. ii Another leading
/supreme/docs/1602aappendix.pdf - 2017-03-24
§ 33 at 205, n. 5 (7 th ed.). Prior editions used the same language. ii Another leading
/supreme/docs/1602aappendix.pdf - 2017-03-24