Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 191 - 200 of 69073 for he.
Search results 191 - 200 of 69073 for he.
[PDF]
NOTICE
bodily harm by intoxicated use of a motor No. 2005AP3162-CR 2 vehicle.1 He has also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28606 - 2014-09-15
bodily harm by intoxicated use of a motor No. 2005AP3162-CR 2 vehicle.1 He has also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28606 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. See WIS. STAT. § 940.01(1)(a). He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27492 - 2014-09-15
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. See WIS. STAT. § 940.01(1)(a). He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27492 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by intoxicated use of a motor vehicle.[1] He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28606 - 2007-04-03
by intoxicated use of a motor vehicle.[1] He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28606 - 2007-04-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
to withdraw his pleas.1 Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50893 - 2014-09-15
to withdraw his pleas.1 Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50893 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postdisposition motion. He challenges the court’s determination that the County met its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699402 - 2023-09-06
denying his postdisposition motion. He challenges the court’s determination that the County met its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699402 - 2023-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
pleas.[1] Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial counsel who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50893 - 2010-06-14
pleas.[1] Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial counsel who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50893 - 2010-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and treatment during that time. He asserts Winnebago County (the County) did not present sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935850 - 2025-04-02
and treatment during that time. He asserts Winnebago County (the County) did not present sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935850 - 2025-04-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-10). 1 He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Kucharski argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111593 - 2017-09-21
-10). 1 He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Kucharski argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111593 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
with the use of a dangerous weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01(1)(a) & 939.63(1)(b) (2009‑10).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111593 - 2014-05-05
with the use of a dangerous weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01(1)(a) & 939.63(1)(b) (2009‑10).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111593 - 2014-05-05
[PDF]
State v. Charles G. Montgomery
, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.06(1) and 939.63 (2001- No. 2004AP2398-CR 2 02). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21122 - 2017-09-21
, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.06(1) and 939.63 (2001- No. 2004AP2398-CR 2 02). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21122 - 2017-09-21

