Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 191 - 200 of 69076 for he.
Search results 191 - 200 of 69076 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postdisposition motion. He challenges the court’s determination that the County met its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699402 - 2023-09-06
denying his postdisposition motion. He challenges the court’s determination that the County met its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699402 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and treatment during that time. He asserts Winnebago County (the County) did not present sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935850 - 2025-04-02
and treatment during that time. He asserts Winnebago County (the County) did not present sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935850 - 2025-04-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-10). 1 He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Kucharski argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111593 - 2017-09-21
-10). 1 He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Kucharski argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111593 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
with the use of a dangerous weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01(1)(a) & 939.63(1)(b) (2009‑10).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111593 - 2014-05-05
with the use of a dangerous weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01(1)(a) & 939.63(1)(b) (2009‑10).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111593 - 2014-05-05
[PDF]
State v. Charles G. Montgomery
, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.06(1) and 939.63 (2001- No. 2004AP2398-CR 2 02). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21122 - 2017-09-21
, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.06(1) and 939.63 (2001- No. 2004AP2398-CR 2 02). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21122 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles G. Montgomery
, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.06(1) and 939.63 (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21122 - 2006-01-30
, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.06(1) and 939.63 (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21122 - 2006-01-30
State v. Christopher Anderson
and commented on that silence during closing argument. He also argues that this error was not harmless. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21458 - 2006-02-20
and commented on that silence during closing argument. He also argues that this error was not harmless. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21458 - 2006-02-20
State v. Kevin J. Tank
that his refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test was unreasonable. He claims that the refusal was due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13661 - 2005-03-31
that his refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test was unreasonable. He claims that the refusal was due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13661 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
sentencing, he moved to withdraw his plea based on alternative grounds: ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27361 - 2006-12-06
sentencing, he moved to withdraw his plea based on alternative grounds: ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27361 - 2006-12-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
entered a guilty plea to armed robbery. After sentencing, he moved to withdraw his plea based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27361 - 2014-09-15
entered a guilty plea to armed robbery. After sentencing, he moved to withdraw his plea based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27361 - 2014-09-15